Hi guys,
I'd like to thank you for this implementation. @Pierre: There is a RFC I wrote: http://wiki.php.net/rfc/jsonable I'd suggest to rather be JSONSerializable or be Jsonable. JSON is an acronym, the same as PDO. We don't have interface for Pdo, but for PDO. So we should keep consistency. Cheers, On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Hannes Magnusson > <hannes.magnus...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 00:48, Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote: >>> pollita Wed, 05 May 2010 22:48:14 +0000 >>> >>> Revision: http://svn.php.net/viewvc?view=revision&revision=299037 >>> >>> Log: >>> Add JSON_Serializable interface >> >> Slight bikeshedding.. but we don't use underscore for interface/classnames... > > And I would go with JsonSerializable. > > However, where does it come from? Does it have to be an interface or > why not using __toJson? I must have lived under a rock as I don't see > any proposal either, be RFC or internals. > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Guilherme Blanco - Web Developer CBC - Certified Bindows Consultant Cell Phone: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com URL: http://blog.bisna.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php