On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Antony Dovgal <t...@daylessday.org> wrote:
> Now I was never an XML fan myself, but I think THIS particular XML config file
> is even easier to read and understand than php.ini.

Actually, I agree with Antony on this point. The existing XML config
file is pretty easy to read. I didn't implement it myself, but during
a (brief period) as maintainer for the FPM code, I saw absolutely no
need to change it. Even if you are unfamiliar with xml, the file is
well commented. But heh, I happened to be one of those people who
never really understood php ini files. So maybe im a bit biased. But I
never *ever* had even a single person email me saying they couldnt
understand the xml config file. If anything, it felt like quite the
reverse situation. People kept emailing me, telling me all this stuff
about what it did, that I was unaware of.

Whats missing in my view is clear documentation to explain each of the
configuration options. Which may be a good thing for either the FPM
unix man page, or the parallel (seperate) php online documentation.

> --
> Wbr,
> Antony Dovgal
> ---
> http://pinba.org - realtime statistics for PHP
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to