On 18.03.2010, at 18:48, David Soria Parra <d...@php.net> wrote:
On 2010-03-18, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Derick Rethans <der...@php.net>
wrote:
I do agree that we need to do major releases more often, but just
setting a time already feels wrong. It's still open source, so it's
ready when it is ready. That of course should not mean that we
should
keep on adding features endlessly.
for releases, avoid commits rushes right before the freeze, etc. As
I've been said before already, I'm all for a fixed release cycle, it
is then much easier to define clear priorities and roadmaps.
+1. i think having a fixed release cycle has nothing to do with
being opensource or not but with being more predictable for people
depending on release dates.
right. and again i think i was quite explict in my original mail that
common sense still applies. if we have a buggy release we will
obviously not release it just because. as for having enough to
actually warrant a release i do not ever remember a time where there
werent atleast a handful feasible proposals in varying size on the
table.
regard
Lukas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
