On 17 March 2010 16:50, Jan Schneider <j...@horde.org> wrote: > How about 5.3.99? A lot of projects use this for pre-releases, but it still > might make sense.
I'm wary of sticking with anything starting with 5.3 if we're going to break binary compatibility on the new trunk (which we presumably are) — it undermines the usual binary compatibility guarantees on "stable" branches, even given that the new trunk is a development branch. As Johannes said: >> We can still increase the number if needed. I completely agree. IMO, there's nothing wrong with calling it 5.4 now and renumbering it to 6.0/7.0/whatever (in the same manner as what Postgres are currently doing with 8.5 becoming 9.0) later if it makes sense to. Adam -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
