Hi, For the record here, as far as I can see, the bugs have been fixed by Jani. Please go testing and report any reminding issues :)
Cheers, On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Keisial<keis...@gmail.com> wrote: > Andi Gutmans wrote: >> If this is indeed a use-case for CGI then I think it's a valid argument >> and we are probably better off supporting it. I did not remember shebang >> works for real CGI. >> There are still plenty of use-cases for running CGI (as opposed to >> FastCGI) in the industry. >> Question now is whether this should be done in the scanner or in the >> SAPI. I'll check with Dmitry who made this change. >> >> Andi >> > Probably in sapi, so it only affects cgi and cli, and doesn't > reintroduce bug 46844. > OTOH, skipping shebang on included files could be a feature, if someone > uses cgi and uses > files both as entrypoint and included scripts. > A compromise might be skipping shebang line only when it's followed by > <?php, but it's hackish. > > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
