Steph Fox wrote:
Please can those people who didn't already express a clear and relevant opinion, express it now? We don't have long to play with this if there's to be namespace support in 5.3.At present it looks like a two-horse race between #1 full disambiguation (:::) and #3 explicit disambiguation ('use namespace'). Method of tally: anything that would be acceptable to the voter gets a point. (A weighted version is also offered here.) D/S means 'with different separator'. Name Issue A Issue B ====================================================== Greg #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes Guilherme #3 Yes Kalle #4 Yes Tony Bibbs #3 Yes Jaroslav Hanslik #1 (alt #3) Yes Nathan Rixham #4 (D/S) N/A Liz #1 or #3 Yes Andrei - 'agreed with Gregs approach' N/A Janusz Lewandowski #4 Yes Steph #3 (alt #2) Abstained Josh Davies - '#1 and #2 are functionally the same' N/A Hannes - put in a plea for classes only in 5.3 N/A Lester - WROTE SOMETHING LOUD N/A Alexey #3 Yes Marc Boeren #1 (D/S) N/A Derick #1 No Vesselin Kenashkov #3 Yes Lars #3 (alt #2) N/A Karsten Damberkalns #1 (alt #3) Yes Jochem Maas #2 (alt #3, #1) Yes Richard Quadling #1 (alt #2) No Issue A: #1 - 8 (1 with different separator) #2 - 5 #3 - 11 #4 - 3 (1 with different separator) Issue A weighted (first choice gets 2 points, rest 1): #1 - 12 + 2 = 14 #2 - 4 + 3 = 7 #3 - 12 + 5 = 17 #4 - 6 + 0 = 6 Issue B: Yes - 11 No - 2 (see Richard's rationale tho') Abs - 1 N/A - 7
you can add me down for a +1 on the solution to Issue B as well - makes logical sense -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
