On Wednesday 15 October 2008 11:16:09 Lester Caine wrote: > THAT is probably why I am asking the question? And may well be key to my > understanding why converting non OO code into OO code in PHP is so > problematic. When I was coding in CC++ more heavily libraries did not need > to be objects and the 'namespace' just wrapped the code OR the code was > built as an object. That is what I understand by a namespace, so perhaps I > do not understand why leaving out functions and constants is acceptable :(
Uhm. Even the standard library in C++ has a lot of classes and objects in the std namespace. Boost in boost. Where did you get that notion of exclusive or? Regards, Stefan -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
