Hello everybody,
Am Dienstag, den 12.08.2008, 03:04 +0200 schrieb Etienne Kneuss:
[...]
> To me
>
> namespace A {
> code
> }
>
> namespace B {
> code
> }
>
> code
>
> seems equivalent to
>
> namespace A;
> code
> namespace B;
> code
> namespace <none>;
> code
>
> Only nicer. And I can hardly how it's going to cause more problems?
> But if that's so, fine.
[...]Just one thing: we developed around 50.000 lines of code with the current namespace syntax and it was neither confusing nor inconsistent to use. I'm very happy with the current syntax and I would like to just leave it as it is. Also I'm really against the curly braces: the issue is, that we would indent the single class in the file then as otherwise the sense of braces would be caricatured: we indent to make sure we can easily distinguish control structures. But if we indent the content of a namespace, we will have less characters until the magic 80-100 character border and therefore we will have linebreaks in conditions which makes them hard to read. cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
