2008/6/28 Jordan Wambaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Jun 28, 2008, at 7:27 AM, David Coallier wrote:
>
>> The idea of the new parsing parameter is to catch the number of
>> parameters as well. For instance when you have
>>
>> if (ZEND_NUM_ARGS() < 2) {
>> WRONG_PARAM_COUNT;
>> }
>>
>> then your zend parse param function call should have 2 params or more
>> Ex:
>>
>> int argc;
>> char *name;
>> zval **other;
>>
>> if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "sZ", &name,
>> &other, &argc) == FAILURE) {
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> This way of parsing the parameters remove the ZEND_NUM_ARGS() and
>> WRONG_PARAM_COUNT and adds consistency in the return error messages
>> across the language.
>>
>> Also next time please read the previous entries of the thread :
>>
>> See: http://url.ie/hck that was about the 3rd or 4th message.
>>
>> Anyways that's ok, I lot of conflicts now in formatted_print.c and
>> assert.c but I'll work around them to get the resolved. We just have
>> to get organized on which files we'll be working on then. Right now,
>> Olivier is working on file.c and has done string.c so please don't do
>> those 2 files.
>
> Ok, sorry, I didn't catch the thread where you said you were going to work
> on standard. Do you want me to fix it so I'm not checking ZEND_NUM_ARGS, or
> should I just leave that to you?
Go ahead, you are pretty well started, I'll adjust after you are done :)
--
Slan,
David
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
