On Jun 28, 2008, at 7:27 AM, David Coallier wrote:
The idea of the new parsing parameter is to catch the number of
parameters as well. For instance when you have
if (ZEND_NUM_ARGS() < 2) {
WRONG_PARAM_COUNT;
}
then your zend parse param function call should have 2 params or more
Ex:
int argc;
char *name;
zval **other;
if (zend_parse_parameters(ZEND_NUM_ARGS() TSRMLS_CC, "sZ", &name,
&other, &argc) == FAILURE) {
return;
}
This way of parsing the parameters remove the ZEND_NUM_ARGS() and
WRONG_PARAM_COUNT and adds consistency in the return error messages
across the language.
Also next time please read the previous entries of the thread :
See: http://url.ie/hck that was about the 3rd or 4th message.
Anyways that's ok, I lot of conflicts now in formatted_print.c and
assert.c but I'll work around them to get the resolved. We just have
to get organized on which files we'll be working on then. Right now,
Olivier is working on file.c and has done string.c so please don't do
those 2 files.
Ok, sorry, I didn't catch the thread where you said you were going to
work on standard. Do you want me to fix it so I'm not checking
ZEND_NUM_ARGS, or should I just leave that to you?
I noticed mysql needs some love... anyone working on mysql, or can I
take it?
--
Jordan CM Wambaugh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
