On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Greg Beaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must be going crazy. Is there an actual problem that needs solving? > You're saying that a user who improperly installs php_openssl.dll (i.e. > does not follow instructions and set up ssleay.dll and libeay.dll) should > magically be able to use phar with openssl? Why? You are not going crazy, I was asking the same in my very first reply. The only thing I like to see in config.w32 (and config.m4 too if possible) is the dependencies definition. As it has no impact at runtime (as you explained), it can be used at configure and build time to check than the right extension or libraries are used. Or at least, to notify the user than running configure with --disable-all --enable-phar is not enough to give bz2, zlib or ssl support. Cheers, -- Pierre http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
