Hi Chris, Am Samstag, den 31.05.2008, 08:42 -0700 schrieb Chris Stockton: > Not like they will be listened to unless they are "commiters".
They are heard. The issue is, as always in programming, you want to do an informed decision. That's why I don't like architecture astronauts, as they aren't really informed (the day they wrote production code is long gone), that's why your Joe Random, your project manager does not dictate technical details, that's why the guy who joined your company last week doesn't start to decide things he can't estimate yet. Of course you listen to your project manager and of course you listen to the guy who came in lately (you better completely ignore the architecture astronaut ;-)) but there voices have a different weight than the voice of the guy who did all the freaky business logic stuff. Let's stick with the company picture: if your CEO comes in and requests a certain feature, often it is a good idea to unsell it (and if he is good, he will accept a good argument) - because of stability, maintainability, safety and security. I'm not saying the core contributors are always right, but there being core contributors is an evidence. cu, Lars
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil