On 11/27/07, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMHO {0} is sufficiently clear for human consumption.
{NULL, 0, 0} brings real structure dimensions to the context, which is
good (less need to check "headers").
> On 27-Nov-07, at 8:49 AM, Andy Lester wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 27, 2007, at 2:53 AM, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> >
> >>> I've been working on making PHP build under more stringent error
> >>> checking, specifically -Wextra under GCC. This patch cleans up
> >>> dozens
> >>> of struct initializations that are valid C, but could hide future
> >>> problems.
> >>
> >> Doesn't C standard mandate filling up uninitialized fields with 0?
> >
> >
> > Yes. My patch is for human benefit, not the compiler's.
> >
> > --
> > Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance
> >
> > --
> > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
> >
>
> Ilia Alshanetsky
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
