"Bob Chatman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/15/07, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In response to "Daniel Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > On 10/15/07, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/48 > > > > > > > > Hope that article doesn't come across as too harsh, but I really feel > > > > like it needed to be said. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Bill Moran > > > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > > > > > -- > > > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill, > > > > > > Since your blog post didn't allow comments, I'm submitting the > > > original message thread in question right here: > > > > > > > On Thu, May 3, 2007 6:59 am, Crayon wrote: > > > >> On Thursday 03 May 2007 03:18, Richard Lynch wrote: > > > >>> On Wed, May 2, 2007 1:14 pm, Bill Moran wrote: > > > >>> > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=39062 > > > >> > > > >>> This discussion may be better placed on "Internals" where the people > > > >>> who make these decisions hang out more... > > > >> > > > >> Maybe Bill wanted us lowly users to know that the all powerful > > > >> developers > > > >> aren't listening to their users. > > > > > > > > :-) > > > > > > > Some of them are definitely listening here. > > > > > > > And all of them are trying to juggle needs/demands/desires of an > > > > enormous community with more variety than, errr, dog species? > > > > > > > Lord knows I'm not real happy with some of the decisions/directions, > > > > but you know what? Anybody *really* unhappy that cares enough can get > > > > off their butt and start submitting patches, and push things a > > > > different direction. Self included, mind you. :-) > > > > > > It seems to me that Lynch was actually just saying, "you seem as > > > though you have the technical know-how, so jump in feet-first and > > > let's get going!" It wasn't "ripping [you] a new one", as you > > > suggested in your post, unless your "old one" was that defective in > > > the first place and was inadvertently replaced by the "new one". ;-P > > > > > > Before you make a public post demeaning the community that drives > > > the project you are using, no doubt, to help put food on your table, > > > why not take a moment to read this fantastic Wikipedia article: > > > > > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarcasm > > > > Are you implying that I'm being inappropriately sarcastic, or that I'm > > misunderstanding sarcasm when it's used? > > > > Thanks for pulling out your original reply. I intended to post a link > > to the message thread, but today's been crazy. Hopefully I'll find time > > to update that post later this week. Now that you've reminded me, you > > _were_ one of the people who responded in a positive manner. > > > > It's possible that the focus of the article is off, as I wasn't as much > > interested in the mild misunderstandings that occurred on the mailing > > list. The two things I'm frustrated by are: > > > > 1) The use of "not a bug" to close things that look like bugs with no > > further explanation > > 2) The fact that I submitted a fix to a bug 2 weeks ago and nobody has > > even acknowledged it. > > > > Of course, any time you attempt to levy constructive criticism, it's > > liable to be misunderstood. The fact that you're calling it > > "demeaning" is hard evidence that's already happened. My goal here > > is for others to understand the problem, otherwise, nothing can be done > > about it. > > > > As far as the "public" posting, I assure you that hardly anybody reads > > my blog :) http://www.potentialtech.com/awstats/awstats.pl > > (yes, stats collection has been broken for the past week, but you can > > see several months of demonstration that nobody cares what I think :) > > > > Additionally, I think this discussion is of general interest to all > > open source groups. A good friend of mine at CMU has been studying > > open source groups and how they attract contributors, and how they > > sometimes scare them away. My opinion is that the lack of response > > from core developers is going to make contributors think their time > > is better spend elsewhere, and I'd prefer _not_ to see that happen. > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > -- > > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > > > > I feel a bit weird to be the person to bring this up, but i'm not quite sure > why you are directing your irritation at the PHP Community.
I'm not quite sure where you got the impression that I was irritated. Frustrated, yes. Irritated, no. I think I'll follow up with a second post called "What is wrong with the PHP community" as I think I've already got a pretty good insight. It appears as if the users are driving the developers insane. It's been a while since I've had so many people assume that my attempts at directly addressing a problem are targeted at them specifically. It's amazing to me that I can put things in the post like, "this is not intended to be derogatory" and then go on to explain my reason for the post, and people _still_ mistake my intentions. I think it was Hemmingway who said, "The ocean is just the ocean. The sky is just the sky. There is not symbolism!" in response to people desperately trying to read between the lines of his writing to find hidden meaning. There is no hidden meaning in that post. Stop trying to find it and you'll better understand what I'm trying to say. > Your post makes > it sound like its the only community that says such things, Despite my acknowledgement in the third paragraph that I understand that this is a common problem? Despite my previous post to this list that I posted that to my blog because I feel my description of the problem is germane to other projects as well? Sometimes I'm amazed at how hard it is to clearly communicate. > and im quite > certain that the number of communities with open, and closed, source > development all leave much to be said for being friendly because i have been > part of many of them. I can understand why you are irritated and feel > brushed off, No you can't because I'm not irritated, and I don't feel brushed off. In fact, I made my exact feelings clear in the post: frustrated and confused. I'm frustrated because I'm _trying_ to help fix a bug and I'm _unable_ to. I'm confused because I have zero clue what is expected of me if I want to help. For example, if I file a PR with the FreeBSD project that includes a patch, it's usually acted on within a day. If I don't hear anything within a few days, I post to the hackers list requesting someone take a look at the PR. I have _never_ had to go beyond that. I've had a similar experience working with the PostgreSQL project. I have never felt so helpless as I do working with the PHP project. I'm trying to remedy that. I've already sent several emails asking for some feedback on the bug with no response, so I escalated. What would you do? Perhaps your experience with other open source projects mimics mine with the PHP project. But my experience with other projects is pretty different. No, not all projects are the same. Being that I've contributed to many, I wouldn't be having trouble if they were all the same as I'd know what to do. The PHP project is noticeably different than every other one I can remember, and I'm trying to understand how to deal with it. > but thats what happened and you shouldn't think that writing a > blog entry about it and posting it to the internals mailing list is going to > lead to drastic change from within, because the fact still remains that > these people are our puppeteers. I have to be honest, you lost me with "that's what happened", and I'm even more confused by "these people are our puppeteers". > They are developers just as we are, most > with "real jobs" and responsibilities to boot. if you have a bug to be fixed > you may very well have thought of something as being a bug which really > isn't. Taking something like that to heart though seems tired and > unnecessary. Again, I'm confused by your statements. What do you mean by "take to heart?" There were two stories in that post. The first is a complaint that it's very difficult to learn from a project that does not feel the need to communicate. If a developer closes a bug without giving any explanation, that's a failure to communicate, and people (like myself) who are trying to understand what's going on are left out. My second complaint is again about communication. I've no idea why a patch would sit for 2 weeks with absolutely no response. No other project that I'm aware of would ignore an attempt at contribution for that long. If it's a matter of logistics, that's understandable, but _nobody_ on this list felt the need to reply to any of my queries and say, "Bill, it might take a few months, that's just how things work with the PHP project." And the lack of _any_ response is what I would call _wrong_. Sure, at this point it sounds like I'm saying, "The PHP project is doing it wrong!" Well, even if the PHP project is not wrong, it's sufficiently _different_ that it would make sense to explain the differences somewhere. Did I miss a FAQ entry on how to contribute? Because if so, please point me to it and I'll apologize and come back when I've read it carefully. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
