I think ASP tags should go too... Simply because it's not standards
compliant and I think it's good if people are forced to make nice
standards compliant documents... I'd even go so far as to favor dropping
short tags too...
<? echo "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\" ?>\n"; ?>
What a mess!...
Guilherme Blanco wrote:
I really can't see a reason to mantain ASP tags.
Ok, short tags is good because of <?=$something?>, but it doesn't
behavior well with XML documents. So, if your intention is to change
short tags to ASP tag in a near future, ok. ASP tags does not mix XML
documents.
Otherwise, ASP tags is the most useless thing I've ever heard in PHP
sphere. I really don't know why wasn't it dropped in PHP5.
That's what I think... IMHO.
[]s,
On 4/13/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/13/07, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, April 13, 2007 9:16 am, Tijnema ! wrote:
> > I don't see why you are all against dropping the ASP tags. I see
> > people using ASP & PHP in one script, what would that do? If ASP runs
> > first then there isn't a problem, but if PHP runs first, it would
> > execute the ASP code.
>
> There are actually people running both PHP and ASP in series to
> generate HTML?
>
> If they are, they can turn ASP tags *OFF* in php.ini
>
> And they certainly aren't going to be distributing that setup outside
> their own little world...
I've seen such code on the net some time ago...
But should you distribute PHP code with ASP tags? That's not good
either i think. So there's no use of the ASP tags, and they can only
interfere with ASP.
Tijnema
>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
