Agreed; I use this style of coding a lot. I'd prefer "goto" but can deal with it being called "jump".
--Wez. On 11/27/05, Ilia Alshanetsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Zeev Suraski wrote: > > 1. A forward-jumping construct only, to avoid giving users too much > > ammo to shoot themselves in the foot with spaghetti coding. > > One of the major uses of "jump" is the ability to "retry on error" by > jumping backwards inside the code. Given that the limit of the > functionality is completely superficial, there are no engine reasons for > it, I'd much prefer we did not impose it. > > Ilia > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
