Helgi Þormar schrieb: > Yeah indeed, now I'll have a heap of a time when my customers want to > upgrade to PHP 5.1, I find it a bit odd to have this kind of breakage ... > didn't we have similar situation with PEAR::File and the SPL::File ? Which > was later renamed to FileObject so both could happily live side by side ? > (or is my memory failing me)
Just two cents from a user's point of view: If you had put all the time you invested in this flame war about ONE class into already introducing namespaces (e.g. Core\Date or Core:Date or Core::Date, with a notev that I hate the \ syntax) with 5.1.0, it could have been in there already. And If you needed one more convincing argument pro namespaces: Read this thread all over again! OLLi ____________ Bug? That's not a bug, that's a feature. [T. John Wendel] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php