Helgi Þormar schrieb:
> Yeah indeed, now I'll have a heap of a time when my customers want to
> upgrade to PHP 5.1, I find it a bit odd to have this kind of breakage ...
> didn't we have similar situation with PEAR::File and the SPL::File ? Which
> was later renamed to FileObject so both could happily live side by side ?
> (or is my memory failing me)

Just two cents from a user's point of view: If you had put all the time
you invested in this flame war about ONE class into already introducing
namespaces (e.g. Core\Date or Core:Date or Core::Date, with a notev that
I hate the \ syntax) with 5.1.0, it could have been in there already.

And If you needed one more convincing argument pro namespaces: Read this
thread all over again!

OLLi
____________
Bug? That's not a bug, that's a feature.
[T. John Wendel]

-- 
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to