My concern with the self::isVirtual() syntax would be...
class Base {
function __get($name) {
if (!self::isVirtual($name))
throw;
}
}
class Foo {
abstract public $bar = 1;
}
$f = new Foo;
echo $f->bar;
... Are these 'virtual' members going to work like static members, in that using
self:: in a base class doesn't allow access to those static members of
inheriting classes? ie, will the above example throw an error or not, like it
would if a similar thing with statics were to try and be done.
Derick Rethans wrote:
> This is ofcourse overly complicated. A better workable solution would be -
> without breaking BC (suggestions for syntax here are very welcome):
>
> <?php
> class Base
> {
> abstract public $x = 1;
>
> function __get($name)
> {
> if (!self::isVirtual($name))) {
> /* throw error */
> }
> }
> }
>
> $b = new Base();
> echo $b->foo;
> ?>
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
