On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Andrei Zmievski wrote: > On Aug 4, 2005, at 12:09 AM, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > Then you don't do it - it's not a requirement... just an optional thing > > (and ofcourse you can't do the __have_prop() thing then that you > > suggested below. > > Why not? _have_prop() should be able to return true if the class does handle > one of those 1000 properties. They don't need to be declared.
Ah,you meant that __have_prop() should always return the full array of things that are supported. That is fine, as long as we can have this generated from the "abstract" properties that people declared (so that they can be documented properly too). > > Works for me, but it needs to be able to called statically (::) and > > dynamically (->). > > Shouldn't be a problem, should it? Nope. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
