On Monday 06 June 2005 11.01, Christian Schneider wrote: > Magnus Mtt wrote: > > And the much needed goto for the next one (5.2/5.5/6.0 or > > whatever it will be) ? > > Much needed? Matter of taste as lots of existing PHP code proves > :-) What happens if you goto into a loop? I'd rather avoid this > mess.
Matter of taste, I'm not so sure about that. If you have a taste for unmaintainable code to emulate goto, sure, goto isn't something you want then. But I sure as hell don't want to maintain even my own code. See me earlier reply to Stanislav, I just proved my point on IRC just after sending the mail.. Missed a few recursive function calls and several loops. And I didn't even try to understand all logic, just get the relevant parts out of the code. Unmaintainable is the keyword. Magnus Mtt -- <Thoth_> Yeah, well that's why it's numbered 2.3.1... it's for those of us who miss NT-like uptimes -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
