On Jul 14, 2026, at 2:11 PM, Holly Schilling <[email protected]> wrote: > >> correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see why that would be a RFC. (Small) >> internal changes with no change in userland don't go through the RFC process >> and are handled on GitHub instead. This should also target the supported >> version (8.4) instead of master. > > Honestly, I don’t know the norms for this kind of thing. This is a small > change, but it involves an ABI breaking change. That was why I thought it > should target a new release chain (8.6) rather than applying it to 8.4. If > anyone wants to help me steward this out of being a draft, I would welcome > the advice. > > Holly >
For internal API breaking changes, it should definitely target master. Usually for stuff smaller changes in that purview, you shouldn't need an RFC unless requested.
