> correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see why that would be a RFC. (Small) > internal changes with no change in userland don't go through the RFC process > and are handled on GitHub instead. This should also target the supported > version (8.4) instead of master.
Honestly, I don’t know the norms for this kind of thing. This is a small change, but it involves an ABI breaking change. That was why I thought it should target a new release chain (8.6) rather than applying it to 8.4. If anyone wants to help me steward this out of being a draft, I would welcome the advice. Holly
