Hi, On Mon, Jun 29, 2026 at 10:55 AM Gianfrancesco Aurecchia < [email protected]> wrote:
> On process: would you rather I open a formal RFC now, or hold off until > I've prototyped the dtls:// wrapper on top of the polling/offloading > primitives and we've agreed on the shape? Since the wrapper depends on > those landing first, my instinct is to settle the design and get a working > prototype before formalising an RFC rather than opening a concept-only one > now, but I'll follow whatever sequencing you prefer. > > I'm not sure this even needs RFC. By default it doesn't - only if any core dev requests it. But for me the user space exposure will be relatively small and we have got already some API standards from Session RFC so we might not need RFC. It should just start with PR though. > And since you maintain ext/openssl and own the stream rework this sits on: > if I take on the dtls:// wrapper once the primitives are far enough along, > would you be open to steering the design and reviewing the implementation? > I'm glad to do the implementation work myself — I'd just want your > direction and review so it fits the streams architecture you have in mind. > > Yeah I can help with review but my time is quite limited so might be a bit slow over the summer. Kind regards, Jakub
