On 17-8-2024 0:50, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 17.08.2024 at 00:36, Rob Landers wrote:
But otherwise, I think it is healthy for it to be public. Voices
silently silenced, even for a good reason, are never a good thing.
Also, it gives people a chance to advocate for the banned or object
to the banning, if they so choose.
Spot on!
Indeed and I very much appreciate the transparency. It was painful to
read the insults being hurled around, and though it saddens me that it's
needed, I support action having been taken.
I do feel for Derick though, as he (most likely) will now end up getting
tirades as a reply to the temp-ban email... (if history is anything to
go by)
