On 7 April 2024 15:38:04 BST, Saki Takamachi <s...@sakiot.com> wrote:
>> In other words, looking at how the efforts overlap doesn't have to mean
>> abandoning one of them, it can mean finding how one can benefit the other.
>
>I agree that the essence of the debate is as you say.
>However, an argument must always reach a conclusion based on its purpose, and
>combining two arguments with different purposes can make it unclear how to
>reach a conclusion.
Well, that's the original question: are they actually different purposes, from
the point of view of a user?
I just gave a concrete suggestion, which didn't involve "combining two
arguments", it involved splitting them up into three projects which all
complement each other.
It feels like both you and Jordan feel the need to defend the work you've put
in so far, which is a shame; as a neutral party, I want to benefit from *both*
of your efforts. It really doesn't matter to me how many mailing list threads
that requires, as long as there aren't two teams making conflicting designs for
the same feature.
Regards,
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]
