Hi Rowan, >> On 7 April 2024 01:32:29 BST, Jordan LeDoux <jordan.led...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Internals is just volunteers. The people working on BCMath are doing that >> because they want to, the people working on scalar decimal stuff are doing >> that because they want to, and there's no project planning to tell one >> group to stop. That's not how internals works (to the extent it works). > > I kind of disagree. You're absolutely right the detailed effort is almost > always put in by people working on things that interest them, and I want to > make clear up front that I'm extremely grateful to the amount of effort > people do volunteer, given how few are paid to work on any of this. > > However, the goal of the Internals community as a whole is to choose what > changes to make to a language which is used by millions of people. That > absolutely involves project planning, because there isn't a marketplace of > PHP forks with different competing features, and once a feature is added it's > very hard to remove it or change its design. > > If - and I stress I'm not saying this is true - IF these two features have > such an overlap that we would only want to release one, then we shouldn't > just accept whichever is ready first, we should choose which is the better > solution overall. And if that was the case, why would we wait for a polished > implementation of both, then tell one group of volunteers that all their hard > work had been a waste of time? > > So I think the question is very valid: do these two features have distinct > use cases, such that even if we had one, we would still want to spend time on > the other? Or, should we decide a strategy for both groups to work together > towards a single goal? > > That's not about "telling one group to stop", it's about working together for > the benefit of both users and the people volunteering their effort, to whom I > am extremely grateful. > > Regards, > Rowan Tommins > [IMSoP]
I don't think the two threads can be combined because they have different goals. If one side of the argument was, "How about to add BCMath?" then perhaps we should merge the discussion. But BCMath already exists and the agenda is to add an OOP API. In other words, one is about adding new features, and the other is about improving existing features. I agree that it would be wise to merge issues that can be merged. Regards. Saki
