On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 04:52:52PM +0300, Alex Wells wrote: > Based on those issues and PHP, I propose moving the discussions elsewhere - > to some kind of modern platform. Since this is quite a big change in the > processes used, I imagine an RFC would be needed. But before I do that I > want to measure the reactions. If it goes well, I'll proceed with an RFC > draft.
Please: No. The nice thing about email is that stuff just hits my mailbox and I deal with it when I have time. I have my MUA (mutt) always running, I do not want to have something else to monitor. Your points: * having to subscribe. An easy one off task. * Archives: already done * Having to learn rules, bottom posting. All communities have rules. As you say: not hard * Not way of editing: just send a follow up. * No formatting. What is wrong with plain text, it is how PHP is written ? * No reactions. If people are interested they will reply. I agree that one flaw with email is that it is not good at remembering things, that is why people do things like writing RFCs. Note: I mainly lurk on this list, only occasionally making comments. -- Alain Williams Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer. +44 (0) 787 668 0256 https://www.phcomp.co.uk/ Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: https://www.phcomp.co.uk/Contact.html #include <std_disclaimer.h> -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
