On 30.08.2022 at 16:25, Ben Ramsey wrote: >> On Aug 29, 2022, at 05:48, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote: >> >> On 26.08.2022 at 18:28, Sara Golemon wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 7:19 AM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 26.08.2022 at 05:15, Go Kudo wrote: >>>> >>>>> In the actively supported version of PHP, `ksort()` has been modified to >>>>> include BC Break. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/9296 >>>>> >>>>> This may seem like an appropriate bug fix, but it is a clear BC Break. I >>>>> think this change should only be introduced in PHP 8.2 and later. >>>> >>>> In this case, the functions didn't behave as documented, namely to >>>> conform to the general conversion rules, which had a relevant change in >>>> PHP 8.0. Apparently, this case has been overlooked when the change had >>>> been implemented, and only been noticed recently (what still surprises >>>> me). Anyway, fixing the issue now is not really introducing a BC break, >>>> since code relying on the previous behavior did not conform to the >>>> documentation. >>> >>> What I can see is two noble, but conflicting ideals: >>> 1/ sort() and ksort() should be consistent about their sorting algorithms. >>> I think we can all agree about that in the ideal case, at least. >>> 2/ Behavior within a minor release should be self-consistent and >>> predictable. >>> >>> Knowing the discrepancy exists in current releases of 8.0.x and 8.1.x, >>> we're currently in a position where ideal #2 is satisfied, but ideal #1 is >>> failing in a small, and subtle way. The potential consequence of this is >>> sites out there where the inconsistency shows through to end users (though >>> I wouldn't actually expect any breakages as a result, just clowniness). >>> >>> With the recently applied patch, we would resolve ideal #1, but we would do >>> so at the cost of ideal #2. It's doubtful this will actually break any >>> code either, but potentially user-facing affects could be visible, >>> especially in a mixed-version environment (such as during a rolling >>> upgrade). >>> >>> Given the above, my initial inclination is to err on the side of >>> conservatism for 8.0.x at the least (we're nearly at the end of our primary >>> bug-fix cycle anyway) by reverting the fix on our branch. >>> For 8.1, I think we have a more difficult decision to make with over a year >>> of bug-fix releases to go, and I might be swayed to keep the fix around >>> there. >> >> I have reverted the commit on PHP-8.0 just now. Please don't forget to >> revert on PHP-8.0.23. >> >>>>> Fortunately, there is not yet a release in each version that >>> incorporates >>>>> this change. I think it is possible to revert now. >>>> >>>> Well, the fix is part of the currents RCs; that doesn't make it >>>> impossible to revert, but RMs should have a say in that. Thus I'm >>>> adding Sara and Gabriel as recepients. >>> >>> Don't forget Ben and Patrick as well, this impacts 8.1 equally. >> >> Yeah, would be good to hear whether the commit should be reverted on >> PHP-8.1 as well. > > I decided to revert this in PHP-8.1 and PHP-8.1.10 branches, as well.
Thank you! A PR for the documentation is welcome. -- Christoph M. Becker -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
