Hey Jordan, Hey All.

Am 20.07.21 um 10:07 schrieb Jordan LeDoux:
> Another aspect that I thought about after reading your draft was a way to
> structurally avoid concerns about stacking. I don't believe that there
> would necessarily be overt efforts to grant karma to individuals to push
> certain concerns to the side, however it might be worth considering if the
> process could promote a variety of opinions and backgrounds. Even if such a
> situation were considered unlikely, it could be worth writing such a
> process with that in mind if the process involves a sponsor.
> 
> As I said earlier, it makes sense for many reasons to require a sponsor to
> get voting karma, however this may unnecessarily make the applicant
> associated with their sponsor or their sponsor's history and contributions
> (which could be a positive or negative to one person or the other). It also
> makes it less likely that a perspective which is totally unrepresented gets
> sponsored. This could also be a positive thing, as not all perspectives are
> truly relevant or constructive to all the processes. But it might be worth
> considering these impacts explicitly.
> 
> It's also worth considering if people believe that this is a process that
> will be iterated on or if there is a desire to get it right the first time
> and stick with it. Perhaps if the intent is to iterate, or at least
> explicitly revisit the criteria, the RFC could include an expiration at
> which time a vote to either keep or change the process could be held, which
> gives everyone clarity and certainty about the structure over a given
> period.
> 
> Those are my immediate thoughts on your rough draft.


I've incorporated the changes into a PR
https://github.com/heiglandreas/rfc/pull/1/files and also added these
concerns to the PR description.

Either I'll see to it to incorporate them or if someone else wants to
create a PR to discuss those concerns I'd be happy as well.

Cheers

Andreas
-- 
                                                              ,,,
                                                             (o o)
+---------------------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo-+
| Andreas Heigl                                                       |
| mailto:andr...@heigl.org                  N 50°22'59.5" E 08°23'58" |
| https://andreas.heigl.org                                           |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+
| https://hei.gl/appointmentwithandreas                               |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------+

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to