> 1st This is to avoid conflicts with the implementation in ext/standard. I don't want to do it this way either, but I have to do it this way. Since random in ext/standard does not use namespaces, I would like to change the ext/standard side.
> 2nd Although it goes back quite a long time, this implementation was originally based on an extension I submitted to PECL. https://pecl.php.net/package/orng After I posted this to PECL, I found that an object scope RNG had been proposed in the past in the Internals ML, and there was positive feedback about it. https://externals.io/message/112525 However, the proposal never actually took place. This RFC is a realization of that proposal. Is that what you asked? Regards, Go Kudo 2021年7月6日(火) 22:46 Remi Collet <r...@php.net>: > Le 26/06/2021 à 02:39, Go Kudo a écrit : > > Hello Internals. > > > > RFC has been reorganized for finalization. > > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension > > 1st I dislike the name "random_ext", why this "_ext" part ? > > 2nd why not following the standard process ? > > 1/ publish on pecl > 2/ merge in php-src if enough success and good feedback > > > Remi > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
