On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 14:17:33 +0300 "Alexander Valyalkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2004 15:00:30 +0400, Antony Dovgal > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 13:52:42 +0300 > > "Alexander Valyalkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 16:03:19 +0200 (CEST), Derick Rethans > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ok. First of all, my version of the stripslashes() solves following > >> bugs: > >> #9437 > >> #19947 > >> #27848 > > > > All these bugs were marked as 'bogus' (yeah, the first one is bogus > > too, dunno why it's 'closed'). > > So, personally I can't understand what are you trying to fix, if > > nothing is broken. > > > > Read CLOSELY mentioned bug reports. Dont pay attention to the 'Closed' > status of the bugs. It is wrong IHMO. If you think it's wrong - prove it. There are quite detailed reasons why those bugs were considered to be bogus. I'm ok if you're going to improve stripslashes() efficiency and/or to make it just faster, this could be very useful addon. But I doubt it needs some kind of'fixing', 'cos it works ok ATM, as I know. --- WBR, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
