On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > On Monday 01 December 2003 23:27, Derick Rethans wrote: > > > > I don't quite understand the problem. E_STRICT was only meant for people > > > who really want to be pedantic. I think we can make it not part of E_ALL. > > > Is that OK? > > > > SOunds good to me, -Wall with gcc doesn't show all errors either... I > > feel it's very close to this. > > If you're going to do this, then do it backwards compatible and 'leave' E_ALL > at 2047 and move E_STRICT to 2048. > Many apache administrators will thank you for this ;)
E_STRICT already is 2048... it's just that E_ALL shouldn't include it. Derick -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
