Hello Sascha, Saturday, July 5, 2003, 6:34:26 AM, you wrote:
>> What you are saying is that differentiating between a null value from >> next() and not having more elements is impossible without such a function? >> (I just want to be sure I understand what your motivation is). >> I don't really have a problem with array_has_more() the only problem is the >> name is not consistent with the other methods but on the other hand we >> don't allow new functions which don't follow the naming conventions. >> Catch-22? :) SS> The key() can never become false which is why array_has_more SS> is not needed. Yes and no. Yes key can't become false. No because array_has_more returns the information 'has more elements' before accessing them. That is different. It allows loops where key and element do not have to be cached. -- Best regards, Marcus mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
