On Wed, 26 Mar 2003, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> SH>> I believe the way it was designed was:
> SH>>
> SH>> namespace A {
> SH>> namespace A:B {
> SH>> class C {
> SH>> }
> SH>> }
> SH>> }
>
> That's the same thing. As was noted repeatedly on the lists, ':' has no
> semantic meaning, A and A:B are not related in any way.
>
> One again:
> Namespaces are not 'nested'. You can define namespace inside other
> namespace, this does not make them related. There's no namespace nesting.
> ':' in namespace name does not mean anything.
But it *is* confusing (just as function() { function() {} }, but of
course we can not change that anymore). What is the reason of allowing
this 'nested' stuff?
Derick
--
"my other box is your windows PC"
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Derick Rethans http://derickrethans.nl/
PHP Magazine - PHP Magazine for Professionals http://php-mag.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
