SH>> I believe the way it was designed was:
SH>>
SH>> namespace A {
SH>> namespace A:B {
SH>> class C {
SH>> }
SH>> }
SH>> }
That's the same thing. As was noted repeatedly on the lists, ':' has no
semantic meaning, A and A:B are not related in any way.
One again:
Namespaces are not 'nested'. You can define namespace inside other
namespace, this does not make them related. There's no namespace nesting.
':' in namespace name does not mean anything.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Products Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/ +972-3-6139665 ext.109
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
