On 3/19/2026 11:05 PM, Kohei Enju wrote:
On 03/19 16:11, Simon Horman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 06:21:44AM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote:
This series enables the build_skb RX path in igc, which is currently not
enabled in any configuration.
Patch 1/2 adds missing RX hardware timestamp handling in the build_skb
path.
Patch 2/2 enables the build_skb path when XDP is inactive and other
conditions are met.
Tested on Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04).
Changes:
v2:
- don't insist on reverse christmas tree, reducing net diff in the
patch 1/2 (Dima)
v1:
https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/[email protected]/
Kohei Enju (2):
igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb()
igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Hi Tony, thanks for applying this series to next-queue.
I have a question about the process of patch submission.
Sometimes reviewers give RB tags for a whole series like this, but I
think that those tags on the cover letter are not collected
automatically, right?
In this case, should I add RB tags to each patch if I respin for other
reasons, or what is the recommended way to handle this?
Hi Kohei,
If you need to respin, feel free to carry the tags over. If you don't,
I'll bring them over.
Thanks,
Tony
