On 03/19 16:11, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 06:21:44AM +0000, Kohei Enju wrote: > > This series enables the build_skb RX path in igc, which is currently not > > enabled in any configuration. > > > > Patch 1/2 adds missing RX hardware timestamp handling in the build_skb > > path. > > Patch 2/2 enables the build_skb path when XDP is inactive and other > > conditions are met. > > > > Tested on Intel Corporation Ethernet Controller I226-V (rev 04). > > > > Changes: > > v2: > > - don't insist on reverse christmas tree, reducing net diff in the > > patch 1/2 (Dima) > > v1: > > https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/[email protected]/ > > > > Kohei Enju (2): > > igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb() > > igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path > > For the series: > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Hi Tony, thanks for applying this series to next-queue. I have a question about the process of patch submission. Sometimes reviewers give RB tags for a whole series like this, but I think that those tags on the cover letter are not collected automatically, right? In this case, should I add RB tags to each patch if I respin for other reasons, or what is the recommended way to handle this?
