On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 10:20:33 +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:

> Dear Kohei,
> 
> 
> Thank you for your patch.
> 
> Am 13.08.25 um 09:50 schrieb Kohei Enju:
> > rx_long_byte_count shows the value of the GORC (Good Octets Received
> > Count) register. However, the register value is already shown as
> > rx_bytes and they always show the same value.
> > 
> > Remove rx_long_byte_count as the Intel ethernet driver e1000e did in
> > commit 0a939912cf9c ("e1000e: cleanup redundant statistics counter").
> > 
> > Tested on Intel Corporation I350 Gigabit Network Connection.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Kohei Enju <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c | 1 -
> >   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c 
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
> > index c6defc495f13..9c08ebfad804 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/ethtool.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ static const struct igbvf_stats igbvf_gstrings_stats[] = {
> >     { "lbtx_bytes", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gotlbc, stats.base_gotlbc) },
> >     { "tx_restart_queue", IGBVF_STAT(restart_queue, zero_base) },
> >     { "tx_timeout_count", IGBVF_STAT(tx_timeout_count, zero_base) },
> > -   { "rx_long_byte_count", IGBVF_STAT(stats.gorc, stats.base_gorc) },
> >     { "rx_csum_offload_good", IGBVF_STAT(hw_csum_good, zero_base) },
> >     { "rx_csum_offload_errors", IGBVF_STAT(hw_csum_err, zero_base) },
> >     { "rx_header_split", IGBVF_STAT(rx_hdr_split, zero_base) },
> 
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <[email protected]>

Thank you for reviewing!

> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Paul
> 
> 
> PS: Should you resend, *redundant* instead of *duplicated* might better 
> describe the removed counter.

Sure, I resend this patch as v2 with the changes:
  - s/duplicated/redundant/
  - Remove Tested-by: tag
  - Add Reviewed-by: tag

Thanks for the feedback.

Reply via email to