Thanks for the feedback, I will address it in the next version.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:36 AM Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de> wrote:
>
> Dear Brian, dear Manoj,
>
>
> Thank you for your patch.
>
> Am 13.12.24 um 00:33 schrieb Brian Vazquez:
> > From: Manoj Vishwanathan <manojvi...@google.com>
> >
> > Add more information related to the transaction like cookie, vc_op,
> > salt when transaction times out and include similar information
> > when transaction salt does not match.
>
> If possible, the salt mismatch should also go into the summary/title. Maybe:
>
> idpf: Add more info during virtchnl transaction timeout/salt mismatch
>
> > Info output for transaction timeout:
> > -------------------
> > (op:5015 cookie:45fe vc_op:5015 salt:45 timeout:60000ms)
> > -------------------
>
> For easier comparison, before it was:
>
> (op 5015, 60000ms)
>
> > Signed-off-by: Manoj Vishwanathan <manojvi...@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <bria...@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.li...@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c | 13 +++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
> > index 13274544f7f4..c7d82f142f4e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
> > @@ -517,8 +516,10 @@ static ssize_t idpf_vc_xn_exec(struct idpf_adapter
> > *adapter,
> > retval = -ENXIO;
> > goto only_unlock;
> > case IDPF_VC_XN_WAITING:
> > - dev_notice_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Transaction
> > timed-out (op %d, %dms)\n",
> > - params->vc_op, params->timeout_ms);
> > + dev_notice_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev,
> > + "Transaction timed-out (op:%d
> > cookie:%04x vc_op:%d salt:%02x timeout:%dms)\n",
> > + params->vc_op, cookie, xn->vc_op,
> > + xn->salt, params->timeout_ms);
> > retval = -ETIME;
> > break;
> > case IDPF_VC_XN_COMPLETED_SUCCESS:
> > @@ -615,8 +613,9 @@ idpf_vc_xn_forward_reply(struct idpf_adapter *adapter,
> > idpf_vc_xn_lock(xn);
> > salt = FIELD_GET(IDPF_VC_XN_SALT_M, msg_info);
> > if (xn->salt != salt) {
> > - dev_err_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Transaction salt
> > does not match (%02x != %02x)\n",
> > - xn->salt, salt);
> > + dev_err_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Transaction salt
> > does not match (exp:%d@%02x(%d) != got:%d@%02x)\n",
> > + xn->vc_op, xn->salt, xn->state,
> > + ctlq_msg->cookie.mbx.chnl_opcode, salt);
> > idpf_vc_xn_unlock(xn);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Paul
