Dear Brian, dear Manoj,

Thank you for your patch.

Am 13.12.24 um 00:33 schrieb Brian Vazquez:
From: Manoj Vishwanathan <manojvi...@google.com>

Add more information related to the transaction like cookie, vc_op,
salt when transaction times out and include similar information
when transaction salt does not match.

If possible, the salt mismatch should also go into the summary/title. Maybe:

idpf: Add more info during virtchnl transaction timeout/salt mismatch

Info output for transaction timeout:
-------------------
(op:5015 cookie:45fe vc_op:5015 salt:45 timeout:60000ms)
-------------------

For easier comparison, before it was:

(op 5015, 60000ms)

Signed-off-by: Manoj Vishwanathan <manojvi...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <bria...@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavan Kumar Linga <pavan.kumar.li...@intel.com>
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c | 13 +++++++++----
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
index 13274544f7f4..c7d82f142f4e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_virtchnl.c
@@ -517,8 +516,10 @@ static ssize_t idpf_vc_xn_exec(struct idpf_adapter 
*adapter,
                retval = -ENXIO;
                goto only_unlock;
        case IDPF_VC_XN_WAITING:
-               dev_notice_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Transaction timed-out 
(op %d, %dms)\n",
-                                      params->vc_op, params->timeout_ms);
+               dev_notice_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev,
+                                      "Transaction timed-out (op:%d cookie:%04x 
vc_op:%d salt:%02x timeout:%dms)\n",
+                                      params->vc_op, cookie, xn->vc_op,
+                                      xn->salt, params->timeout_ms);
                retval = -ETIME;
                break;
        case IDPF_VC_XN_COMPLETED_SUCCESS:
@@ -615,8 +613,9 @@ idpf_vc_xn_forward_reply(struct idpf_adapter *adapter,
        idpf_vc_xn_lock(xn);
        salt = FIELD_GET(IDPF_VC_XN_SALT_M, msg_info);
        if (xn->salt != salt) {
-               dev_err_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Transaction salt does not 
match (%02x != %02x)\n",
-                                   xn->salt, salt);
+               dev_err_ratelimited(&adapter->pdev->dev, "Transaction salt does not 
match (exp:%d@%02x(%d) != got:%d@%02x)\n",
+                                   xn->vc_op, xn->salt, xn->state,
+                                   ctlq_msg->cookie.mbx.chnl_opcode, salt);
                idpf_vc_xn_unlock(xn);
                return -EINVAL;
        }

Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmen...@molgen.mpg.de>


Kind regards,

Paul

Reply via email to