On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 10:07:52PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Simon Horman <[email protected]> > > Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 2:33 AM > > To: Kolacinski, Karol <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Nguyen, > > Anthony L > > <[email protected]>; Brandeburg, Jesse > > <[email protected]>; Keller, Jacob E <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 iwl-next 1/6] ice: introduce PTP state machine > > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 01:47:12PM +0100, Karol Kolacinski wrote: > > > > Should there be a "From: Jacob" line here to > > match the Signed-off-by below? > > > > > Add PTP state machine so that the driver can correctly identify PTP > > > state around resets. > > > When the driver got information about ungraceful reset, PTP was not > > > prepared for reset and it returned error. When this situation occurs, > > > prepare PTP before rebuilding its structures. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> > > > Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <[email protected]> > > > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> > > > > Hi Karol and Jacob, > > > > FWIIW, The combination of both a Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by tag from > > Jacob seems a little odd to me. If he authored the patch then I would have > > gone with the following (along with the From line mentioned above): > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <[email protected]> > > > > Otherwise, if he reviewed the patch I would have gone with: > > > > Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <[email protected]> > > > > It's a bit odd, because I authored the initial code and patches some time > ago, and Karol has been working to rebase and re-organize the code, so in > some sense he authored part of this. I think a Co-authored would be suitable > here. Additionally, I reviewed the result before it was published here.
Understood. I agree Co-authored might be useful here.
