On Thu, 7 Dec 2023 11:16:10 +0100 Przemek Kitszel wrote: > I have let know our igc TL, architect, and anybody that could be > interested via cc: IWL. And I'm happy that this could be done at > relaxed pace thanks to Johannes
I think you may be expecting us to take Johannes's patch. It's still on the table, but to make things clear - upstream we prefer to wait for the "real fix", so if we agree that fixing igb/igc is a better way (as Heiner pointed out on previous version PM functions are called by the stack under rtnl elsewhere too, just not while device is open) - we'll wait for that. Especially that I'm 80% I complained about the PM in those drivers in the past and nobody seemed to care. It's a constant source of rtnl deadlocks. _______________________________________________ Intel-wired-lan mailing list Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
