On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 04:39:58PM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2016-07-20 at 14:12 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > if (so.aux_batch_size > 8) {
> > - ret = req->engine->dispatch_execbuffer(req,
> > - (so.ggtt_offset +
> > - so.aux_batch_offset),
> > - so.aux_batch_size,
> > - I915_DISPATCH_SECURE);
> > + ret = req->engine->emit_bb_start(req,
> > + (so.ggtt_offset +
> > + so.aux_batch_offset),
> > + so.aux_batch_size,
> > + I915_DISPATCH_SECURE);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out;
> > }
>
> The code above this line is exact reason why I don't like the a->b->c
> (especially when there is repetition). But it's not new to this patch
> so guess it'll do. Some future work to shorten down a little bit might
> not hurt.
I presume you mean req->engine->x here, not so.y. Is it just the depth
and saving 5 columns? Or something else?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
