On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:30PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> All platforms with power well support have runtime PM support, so
> simplify things by explicitly disabling power well support on platforms
> without runtime PM support. This results in holding the init power domain
> reference whenever the driver is loaded in addition to an RPM reference,
> which reflects the reality better and makes it possible to simplify
> things by removing the HAS_RUNTIME_PM special casing from more places in
> a follow-up patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.d...@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 9945040..f4ff5f5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -1908,6 +1908,11 @@ static int
> sanitize_disable_power_well_option(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> int disable_power_well)
> {
> + if (!HAS_RUNTIME_PM(dev_priv)) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("No runtime PM support, disabling display power
> well support\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
Feels a bit too magic to me. Needs a comment at least, otherwise someone
is going to change disable_power_well back into something you can disable
at runtime and then all the old stuff might break.
Grabbing an extra rpm reference explicitly for this purpose might be
less confusing.
> +
> if (disable_power_well >= 0)
> return !!disable_power_well;
>
> --
> 2.5.0
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
