On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 09:31:31AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:48:02AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Instead of querying the reset counter before every access to the ring, > > query it the first time we touch the ring, and do a final compare when > > submitting the request. For correctness, we need to then sanitize how > > the reset_counter is incremented to prevent broken submission and > > waiting across resets, in the process fixing the persistent -EIO we > > still see today on failed waits. > > > > v2: Rebase > > v3: Now with added testcase > > v4: Rebase > > > > Testcase: igt/gem_eio > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > Imo you really can't hide an ABI change in a refactor/optimize patch like > this ... I really think moving check_wedge out of wait_request must be > it's own little patch.
Urm, that is the essential part of the patch in this series. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
