On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 08:48:05AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > We have relied upon the sole caller (wait_ioctl) validating the timeout > argument. However, when waiting for multiple requests I forgot to ensure > that the timeout was still positive on the later requests. This is more > simply done inside __i915_wait_request. > > Fixes a minor regression introduced in > > commit b47161858ba13c9c7e03333132230d66e008dd55 > Author: Chris Wilson <ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk> > Date: Mon Apr 27 13:41:17 2015 +0100 > > drm/i915: Implement inter-engine read-read optimisations > > where we may end up waiting for an extra jiffie for each active ring > after consuming all of the user's timeout.
where we may end up waiting for an extra jiffie (added by nsecs_to_jiffie_timeout to guarantee minimum duration) for each active ring after consuming all of the user's timeout -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
