Hi,
On 19 June 2015 at 09:02, Maarten Lankhorst
<maarten.lankho...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> + if (crtc->state->enable) {
> + intel_mode_from_pipe_config(&crtc->mode,
> + to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state));
> +
> intel_mode_from_pipe_config(&crtc->state->adjusted_mode,
> + to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state));
> +
> + if (drm_atomic_set_mode_for_crtc(crtc->state,
> &crtc->mode) < 0)
> + drm_mode_copy(&crtc->state->mode,
> &crtc->mode);
I've never really understood why this is here. There are only two ways
in which set_mode_for_crtc can fail: either the mode fails validation
(fixed in the patch I sent you the other day, which it seems like
you've now pulled in), or -ENOMEM. The first one we shouldn't really
be papering over - and I haven't seen it happen since that patch - and
the second one isn't really recoverable anyway. Plus I would argue
that breaking the state like that is pretty bad.
Cheers,
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
