On 03/12/2015 11:36 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote: >> On 02/11/2015 09:43 AM, Damien Lespiau wrote: >>> v2: Use the recently introduced INTEL_REVID() and SKL_REVID defines >>> (Nick Hoath) >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 5 ++++- >>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>> index d4c82d7..a7bc3e8 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c >>> @@ -129,7 +129,10 @@ intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) >>> case DP_LINK_BW_2_7: >>> break; >>> case DP_LINK_BW_5_4: /* 1.2 capable displays may advertise higher bw */ >>> - if (((IS_HASWELL(dev) && !IS_HSW_ULX(dev)) || >>> + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_B0) >>> + /* WaDisableHBR2:skl */ >>> + max_link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_2_7; >>> + else if (((IS_HASWELL(dev) && !IS_HSW_ULX(dev)) || >>> INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) && >>> intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= 0x12) >>> max_link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_5_4; >>> >> >> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> >> Tested-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> > > Potentially > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89554
Yeah hopefully. I definitely need it here for eDP to come up reliably. Jesse _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
