On Thu, 12 Mar 2015, Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 09:43 AM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> v2: Use the recently introduced INTEL_REVID() and SKL_REVID defines
>>     (Nick Hoath)
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lesp...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 5 ++++-
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> index d4c82d7..a7bc3e8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
>> @@ -129,7 +129,10 @@ intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>>      case DP_LINK_BW_2_7:
>>              break;
>>      case DP_LINK_BW_5_4: /* 1.2 capable displays may advertise higher bw */
>> -            if (((IS_HASWELL(dev) && !IS_HSW_ULX(dev)) ||
>> +            if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev) && INTEL_REVID(dev) <= SKL_REVID_B0)
>> +                    /* WaDisableHBR2:skl */
>> +                    max_link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_2_7;
>> +            else if (((IS_HASWELL(dev) && !IS_HSW_ULX(dev)) ||
>>                   INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen >= 8) &&
>>                  intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] >= 0x12)
>>                      max_link_bw = DP_LINK_BW_5_4;
>> 
>
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>
> Tested-by: Jesse Barnes <jbar...@virtuousgeek.org>

Potentially

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89554


> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to