On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:41:12PM +0100, john.c.harri...@intel.com wrote:
> From: John Harrison <john.c.harri...@intel.com>
> 
> For: VIZ-4377
> Signed-off-by: john.c.harri...@intel.com

I think this should be squashed (well, split first) into the relevant
earlier patches. Generally I much prefer kzalloc, and we use that almost
everywhere.

Or does this silently fix some issue and doesn't tell?
-Daniel

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c        |    3 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c |    3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> index 97e6b92..5a75eb5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -802,13 +802,12 @@ static int logical_ring_alloc_request(struct 
> intel_engine_cs *ring,
>       if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     request = kmalloc(sizeof(*request), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     request = kzalloc(sizeof(*request), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (request == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       kref_init(&request->ref);
>       request->ring = ring;
> -     request->complete = false;
>  
>       ret = i915_gem_get_seqno(ring->dev, &request->seqno);
>       if (ret) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> index df9c7e3..0f2719d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c
> @@ -2017,13 +2017,12 @@ intel_ring_alloc_request(struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
>       if (ring->outstanding_lazy_request)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     request = kmalloc(sizeof(*request), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     request = kzalloc(sizeof(*request), GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (request == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
>       kref_init(&request->ref);
>       request->ring = ring;
> -     request->complete = false;
>  
>       ret = i915_gem_get_seqno(ring->dev, &request->seqno);
>       if (ret) {
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to